Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Index of My RTI Judgements, as SCIC Goa

Index  of My RTI Judgements, as SCIC Goa
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 210 of 2012 Namit Sharma … Petitioner Versus Union of India … Respondent 
J U D G M E N T Swatanter Kumar, J. September 13, 2012
" We are of the considered view that it is an unquestionable proposition of law that the Commission is a ‘judicial tribunal’ performing functions of ‘judicial’ as well as ‘quasijudicial’ nature and having the trappings of a Court. It is an important cog and is part of the court attached system of administration of justice, unlike a ministerial tribunal which is more influenced and controlled and performs functions akin to the machinery of administration. 7. It will be just, fair and proper that the first appellate authority (i.e. the senior officers to be nominated in terms of Section 5 of the Act of 2005) preferably should be the 104 persons possessing a degree in law or having adequate knowledge and experience in the field of law. 8. The Information Commissions at the respective levels shall henceforth work in Benches of two members each. One of them being a ‘judicial member’, while the other an ‘expert member’. The judicial member should be a person possessing a degree in law, having a judicially trained mind and experience in performing judicial functions. A law officer or a lawyer may also be eligible provided he is a person who has practiced law at least for a period of twenty years as on the date of the advertisement. Such lawyer should also have experience in social work. We are of the considered view that the competent authority should prefer a person who is or has been a Judge of the High Court for appointment as Information Commissioners. Chief Information Commissioner at the Centre or State level shall only be a person who is or has been a Chief Justice of the High Court or a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. 9. The appointment of the judicial members to any of these posts shall be made ‘in consultation’ with the Chief Justice 105 of India and Chief Justices of the High Courts of the respective States, as the case may be. 10. The appointment of the Information Commissioners at both levels should be made from amongst the persons empanelled by the DoPT in the case of Centre and the concerned Ministry in the case of a State. The panel has to be prepared upon due advertisement and on a rational basis as afore-recorded. 11. The panel so prepared by the DoPT or the concerned Ministry ought to be placed before the High-powered Committee in terms of Section 12(3), for final recommendation to the President of India. Needless to repeat that the High Powered Committee at the Centre and the State levels is expected to adopt a fair and transparent method of recommending the names for appointment to the competent authority. 12. The selection process should be commenced at least three months prior to the occurrence of vacancy. 13. This judgment shall have effect only prospectively" -- The EPITOME of THAPPA SANSKRITI (Later modified by larger bench of SC)







YEAR 2008

Appeal 308/SCIC/2008 on 22/07/2014

YEAR 2009

Complaint
Compl 101/SIC/2009  on  05/08/2014

YEAR 2010
Appeal
Appeal 78-SIC-2010 on 29-04-2014
Appeal 80/SIC/2010-w- on 29/04/2014
Appeal 81/SIC/2010 on 29/04/2014
Appeal 174/SIC/2010-R- on 17/12/2014
***Appeal 222/SCIC/2010 on : 12/12/2014 दुर्भाटकर
Appeal 575/SCIC/2010
Appeal 78/SIC/2010 Decided on. 29/04/2014
Complaint

Comp.572/SCIC/2010  on 13.01.2014

Comp 595/SIC/2010 +38/SIC/2011+ Appeal No. 190/SIC/2011-W-on 18/06/2014
Comp  597/SIC/2010-P- on:  18/06/2014
Penalty

Pena No 13/2010 in Appeal  24/SCIC/2010-f - on ???
Penalty: 69/2010 In Complaint No. 450/SCIC/2010  Decided on 14/04/2014
YEAR 2011
Appeal
Appeal 78/SCIC/2011+122/SCIC/2011-W- on 18/06/2014

Appeal 123/SCIC/2011 on: 01/08/2014

Appeal 129/SCIC/2011 on 06/01/2014


Appeal 184/SCIC/2011 and 188/SCIC/2011 bothon 12/05/2014


Appeal 193/SCIC/2011 on: 13/01/2014

App 230-231/SCIC/2011???????????????

App 259/SIC/2011???????????????


Complaint
Comp 36/SIC/2012 on: 23/07/2014
Comp 38/SIC/2011 + Comp 595/SIC/2010  + Appeal No. 190/SIC/2011-W-on 18/06/2014
Complaint No. 56/SCIC/2012 Decided on 17/11/2014

Comp 57/SIC/2011  on: 07/04/2014


******Comp 64/SCIC/2011 Interim  order pronounced on 07/01/2015
Complaint No. 101/SIC/2012 Decided on :30/10/2014
Comp 109/SCIC/2011 on: 28/11/2014
Comp 133/SIC/2011+78/SIC/2012-W-on 04/08/2014
Complaint 143/SIC/2012  Decided on 06.02.2014
Complaint No. 147/SCIC/2011   Decided on : 08/12/2014
Complaint No. 158/SCIC/2011  Decided on 20/11/2014
Complaint No. 170/SCIC/2011  Decided on 27/08/2014
Comp 178/SCIC/2011 on 20/08/2014
Complaint No. 181/SCIC/2011 INTERIM ORDER  Dated:- 11/12/2014
Comp 510/SIC/2010 on: 26/09/2014
Comp 511/SIC/2010 on: 15/10/2014

Penalty

Penalty No. 18/2011 In Appeal 207/SCIC/2010 on 23/06/2014

Penalty No. 29/2011 In Appeal 220/SCIC/2010 on 24/07/2014 निसा

Penalty No. 41/2011 in Appeal No. 51/SIC/2010

Pena  No. 42/2011 In Appeal 152/SIC/2010 on 06/06/2014

Penalty 67/2011 ???????????????????


YEAR 2012
Appeal
Appeal 12/SCIC/2012 + Appeal 14/SCIC/2012 on: 23/04/2014
Appeal 13-SIC-2012


App 16/SIC/2012

APP 44/SCIC/2012
Appeal 45-SIC-2012  and Penalty 33-2014 on 20/11/2014
Appeal 69/SCIC/2012
Appeal 70/SCIC/2012 on 31/01/2014
Appeal 94/SIC/2012 on 06/05/2014
Appeal 100+101/SCIC/2012-W-on 25/09/2014
Appeal 107-SIC-2012 on 11/08/2014
Appeal 118/SIC/2012 on 08/12/2014
Appeal 123/SIC/2012 on 11/11/20
Appeal 126-SCIC-2012 and Appeal 127-SCIC-2012 on 23/05/2014
Appeal 128/SCIC/2012 on 23/05/2014

Appeal 133/SIC/2012 on:24/04/2014

Appeal 172/SIC/2012 on17.12.2013

Appeal 173/SIC/2012 o17.12.2013

Appeal 179/SCIC/2012  on: 11/07/2014

Appeal 206/SIC/2012 on: 24/04/2014
Appeal No.135/SCIC/2012 Decided On. 23/09/2014
Appeal No. 126/SCIC/2012, Appeal No. 127/SCIC/2012 Decided on. 23/05/2014
Appeal No. 107/SIC/2012 Decided on. 11/08/2014
Appeal No. 17/SIC/2012 Decided on. 27/10/2014
Complaint
Complaint No. 12/SCIC/2012  Decided on: 28/11/2014
Comp 16/SCIC/2012 on: 21/05/2014
Comp 36/SIC/2012 on 14/11/2014
Complaint No. 55/SCIC/2012 Decided on 17/11/2014
Complaint No. 57/SCIC/2012 Decided on 17/11/2014
Complaint No. 61/SIC/2012 Interim Order dated: 06/01/2015 
Complaint No. 73/SIC/2012 Decided on : 04/08/2014
Comp78+79/SIC/2012+ 133/SIC/2011-W-on 04/08/2014
Comp 83/SCIC/2012  Comp 83/SCIC/2012 on 01/12/2014 
Complaint No. 85/SCIC/2012 and Penalty 20/2014 In Complaint No. 85/SCIC/2012 ???????
Compl 99/SIC/2012 on 25/04/2014
Complaint No. 114/SCIC/2012 Decided on:08/10/2014
Comp 118/SIC/2012 on  03/11/2014
Complaint No. 119/SIC/2012 Decided on: 28/10/2014
Complaint No:123/SIC/2012 Decided on:28/07/2014
ComplaintNo.125/SCIC/2012  Decided on 19/11/2014
Comp 131/SIC/2012 on:19/06/2014
Complaint No. 134/SCIC/2012 Decided on :19/11/2014
Compl 143/SIC/2012 on 06.02.2014
Complaint No: 148/SIC/2012  Decided on :13/02/2014
Comp 153/SCIC/2012 on: 22/04/2014
Comp 160/SIC/2012 on: 06/02/2014
Penalty
Penalty 02/2012 in Appeal 63/SIC/2011-F- on  09/01/2015
Penalty 03+04+05/2012-W- on 19/08/2014
Penalty 15/2012 on: 28/05/2014
Incoplete PenaltyNo.16/2012 in Complaint .80/SIC/2011  on. 20/05/2014
Pen  No. 29/2012 In Appeal 10/SIC/2012 on  20/10/2014
Penalty 33/2012 on 21/05/2014

Penalty No. 40/2012 on 30/01/2014


YEAR 2013
Appeal

Appeal 01/SIC/2013-W-05/03/2014

Appeal 03/SCIC/2013 on  27/10/2014

Appeal 13/SIC/2013 on 26.11.2013  or should it be 13/SIC/2012 as per filing date ?

Appeal 19/SCIC/2013 on  06/01/2014

Appeal 23/SIC/2013 on 11.11.2013

Appeal 72/SIC/2013 on: 20/11/2013

Appeal 88/SIC/2013 on: 04/03/2014

Appeal.121/SIC/2013 on 11/04/2014

Complaint

Complaint 73-75-77/SCIC/2013

YEAR 2014
Appeal


Appeal 10/SCIC/2014 on: 10/11/2014

Appeal 37/SCIC/2014 
Appeal 72/SCIC/2014 on 12/11//2014
Appeal  73/SCIC/2014 on 06/01/2015
Appeal 83/SCIC/2014  on 15/01/2015
Appeal 102/SCIC/2014 on 17/11/2014
Appeal 109/SCIC/2014-W-on 12/11//2014
Complaint

ComplaintNo. 1/SCIC/2014
ComplaintNo.02/SCIC/2014  Decided on 25/11/2014
Compl 7/SIC/2014 on  5/11/2014- शांग्रीला सोसायटी

Comp 12/SCIC/2014 on 12/11/2014

Comp 13/SCIC/2014+Comp 146/SCIC/2013 on: 08/10/2014
Complaint No. 15/SCIC/2014  Decided on: 18/11/2014
Complaint 16/SCIC/2014-P-on: 28/10/2014

Penalty

Penalty 09/2014 in Appeal 184/SCIC/2012  Interim Order on 26/08/2014
Penalty No. 12/2014 in Appeal 103/SCIC/2013 on  19/11/2014
Penalty 14/2014 & 15/2014 on 10/10/2014 --Table tennis Association
Penalty 20/2014 In Complaint No. 85/SCIC/2012
Penalty 23/2014 In Appeal 108/SIC/2012 on 14/08/2014
Penalty No. 34/2014
Penalty No. 39/2014 in Complaint No. 134/SCIC/2012 19-11-2014
INTERIM ORDERS
Appeal 148/SIC/2011  Interim Order 28 /11/2014
Comp 162/SCIC/2012
App 114/SCIC/2013
APP 79/SCIC/2013
ROJNAMA

App 175/SIC/2012
APP 79/SCIC/2013
APP 64/SCIC/2013
App 30/SIC/201
App 168/SCIC/2013
App 63/SIC/2012






















No comments:

Post a Comment