GOA
STATE INFORMATION COMMISISON
Ground
Floor, Shrama Shakti Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji-Goa
Coram
: Smt. Leena Mehendale, State Chief Information Commissioner
Complaint
No. 153/SIC/2010
Decided
on 13/05/2014
Mr.
Ajit S. Porob
“SHASHI
SADAN”
H.
No. 133/3,
Palmar-Pomburpa,
Bardez-Goa ……Complainant
V/s
The
Public Information Officer/
The
Mamlatdar of Ponda Taluka
Ponda-Goa ……Opponent
O R D E R ( ORAL)
RTI
application dated : -07/01/2010
PIO
reply on : -28/01/2010
First
Appeal filed on : -NIL
FAA
Order dated : -NIL
Complaint
filed on : -24/02/2010
This
Complaint arises from RTI applications dated 07/01/2010 made to PIO
and Mamlatdar of Ponda. Reply was given on 28/01/2010 ( in time) and
received by the Complainant on 06/02/2010. It stated-
With
reference to your application dated 07/01/2010 on the subject cited
above, it is found that
“as per records of this Office no residence certificate have been
issued to Smt. Vaijayanti P. Shet, Mr. Mahindra P. Shet and Ms.
Manisha P. Shet resident of Durbhat, Ponda and presently residing at
Flat No. D/202 Building ‘B’ Mitasu Marvel, Upper Bazar, Ponda.
However, Ms. Milan P. Shet was issued residence certificate”.
A
complaint was made directly to the Office of SCIC, without availing
the remedy of approaching FAA. The Complaint was made on 24/2/2010
on following grounds.
Cont----2/-
----2----
- Though it is admitted that a Residence Certificate was issued to Ms. Milan P. Shet, a copy of the same was not given to the Complainant as asked for
- On 08/02/2010 the Complainant once again approached the Mamlatdar of Ponda pointing out that a certified copy of RC for Ms. Milan P. Shet was not furnished. He made additional demand to also furnish the documents filed by Ms. Milan Shet such as Educational Qualification, Employment Certificate etc.
- The PIO wrote on 22/02/2010 that a copy of RC for Ms. Milan Shet cannot be given, because the records are not available.
Aggrieved
the Complaint was filed directly to SCIC on 24/02/2010. Notices were
issued fixing the hearing on 04/05/2010.
Complainant
was represented by his Advocate till 19/01/2011. Thereafter the case
was adjourned on several occasions and the Complainant continuously
remained absent. Hence it must be presumed that he has lost interest
in the case. Moreover, the information asked is about third party and
no public purpose is stated which would be achieved.
The
PIO filed a reply on 04/05/2010 itself stating that he had informed
about issuance of RC for Ms. Milan Shet. Further, in response to the
2nd
letter dated 08/02/2010 he has informed on 22/02/2010 that certified
copy of RC cannot be issued since the record is not available. In
past, to his other RTI queries, he has been giving all the
information to the appellant Hence, the respondent had not acted
with ill-motives or malafied intensions as alleged by the
Complainant.
-----ORDER----
Complaint
is therefore dismissed . Order declared in Open Court. Parties to be
informed.
Sd/-
(Leena
Mehendale)
Goa
State Chief Information Commissioner
Goa State Information Commission
Panaji-Goa
No comments:
Post a Comment