Appeal No.22/SIC/2013 Decided on :16/12/2014

GOA STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION

Ground Floor, Shrama Shakti Bhavan, Patto Plaza, Panaji – Goa.

CORAM: Smt. Leena Mehendale, State Chief Information Commissioner

Appeal No.22/SIC/2013

Decided on :16/12/2014

Mr. Lambert P.A. Godinho

Son of Mr. Jose Maria de J.G. Godinho,

Age about 32 years,

C/o. Our Lady of Grace High School,

Bicholim, Goa ..….…..Appellant

V/s

1.Headmaster/ Public Information Officer,

O/o. Executive Engineer XVIII(Roads),

Our Lady of Grace High School,

Bicholim, Goa.

2. The Director of Education/ First Appellate Authority,

Directorate of Education,

Porvorim, Bardez, Goa. …… Respondents

O R D E R (Open Court)

RTI application filed on : 13/08/2012

PIO reply :12/09/2012

First Appeal filed on : 10/10/2012

FAA Order dated : 12/11/2012

Second Appeal filed on : 18/02/2013

1) This second appeal arises out of RTI application dated 13/08/2012 made before the PIO/ Headmaster, Our Lady of Grace High School, Bicholim, Goa regarding certified copies of Confidential report, allegations, log book for the year 2011-2012 and observation sheets by the Headmistress in respect he himself, Shri Sunil Nanodkar and Miss Coreen Dias for the year 2011-2012.

2) When the case came up on last date of hearing on 16/12/2014, Appellant and PIO (Martin Rodrigues, Headmaster) were present. Q. 4 was about observation sheets prepared by Headmistress when she was observing Mr. Lambert giving lessons to students. PIO claims the same is not available. The appellant does not want to agitate this point with a proviso as described below at para 4.

3) Appellant submits that he does not want to agitate even point No. 2 which is also claimed as not available with PIO, but with the same proviso.

Contd---2/-

--2--

4) Provided that both those information, which are claimed now as unavailable cannot be brought on record for any departmental action against the appellant on

any subsequent date without first informing it to the appellant by quoting reference of this appeal.

5) The PIO stated that he is aware that whatever is claimed as not available against Mr. Lambert today, cannot be used against him in future in a departmental case, expect as in proviso above stated.

6) This Appeal is closed as withdrawn on above condition at the oral request of Appellant.

• O R D E R -

The second Appeal is dismissed as conditionally withdrawn. Order Declared in Open Court. Inform the Parties.

Sd/-

(Leena Mehendale)

State Chief Information Commissioner

Goa State Information Commission

Panaji – Goa.